[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201210113334.GD4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:33:34 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Simon Budig <simon.budig@...nelconcepts.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: edt-ft5x06 - consolidate handling of number of
electrodes
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:08:03AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 20-12-09 15:09, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
...
> > case EV_FT:
> > reg_addr->reg_threshold = EV_REGISTER_THRESHOLD;
> > + reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
> > reg_addr->reg_gain = EV_REGISTER_GAIN;
> > reg_addr->reg_offset = NO_REGISTER;
> > reg_addr->reg_offset_x = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_X;
> > reg_addr->reg_offset_y = EV_REGISTER_OFFSET_Y;
> > reg_addr->reg_num_x = NO_REGISTER;
> > reg_addr->reg_num_y = NO_REGISTER;
> > - reg_addr->reg_report_rate = NO_REGISTER;
> > break;
>
> Nit:
> Unrelated change.
I guess the motive is to get these assignments consistent between the cases.
Documentation actually allows this kind of modifications of code in one change
when them are toughly related.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists