[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201210142515.GR2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:25:15 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Gabriel Marin <gmx@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] perf: Optimize sched_task() in a context switch
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 08:52:55AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/10/2020 2:13 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Peter and Kan,
> >
> > How can we move this forward?
>
> Hi Namhyung,
>
> Thanks for the test. The changes look good to me.
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Should we resend the patch set for further review?
I've not yet seen a coherent replacement of #3, what I send was just a
PoC.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists