[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chme3WFQzsqHeQx+1vaLpCG7qL=D6QO4+_Vnt=byzC5sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:04:08 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Gabriel Marin <gmx@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] perf: Optimize sched_task() in a context switch
Hi Peter and Kan,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:25 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 08:52:55AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/10/2020 2:13 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > Hi Peter and Kan,
> > >
> > > How can we move this forward?
> >
> > Hi Namhyung,
> >
> > Thanks for the test. The changes look good to me.
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Should we resend the patch set for further review?
>
> I've not yet seen a coherent replacement of #3, what I send was just a
> PoC.
Any updates?
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists