linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] mm/gup: migrate pinned pages out of movable zone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+CK2bDPR8vH+H6cqBn=RTXRCp5kv3ExNPD8DHB09vVWLc3YmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:40:57 -0500
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] mm/gup: migrate pinned pages out of movable zone

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:23 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:21:39PM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > @@ -1593,7 +1592,7 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >                               }
> >
> >                               if (!isolate_lru_page(head)) {
> > -                                     list_add_tail(&head->lru, &cma_page_list);
> > +                                     list_add_tail(&head->lru, &movable_page_list);
> >                                       mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(head),
> >                                                           NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> >                                                           page_is_file_lru(head),
> > @@ -1605,7 +1604,7 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >               i += step;
> >       }
> >
> > -     if (!list_empty(&cma_page_list)) {
> > +     if (!list_empty(&movable_page_list)) {
>
> You didn't answer my earlier question, is it OK that ZONE_MOVABLE
> pages leak out here if ioslate_lru_page() fails but the
> moval_page_list is empty?
>
> I think the answer is no, right?
In my opinion it is OK. We are doing our best to not pin movable
pages, but if isolate_lru_page() fails because pages are currently
locked by someone else, we will end up long-term pinning them.
See comment in this patch:
+        * 1. Pinned pages: (long-term) pinning of movable pages is avoided
+        *    when pages are pinned and faulted, but it is still possible that
+        *    address space already has pages in ZONE_MOVABLE at the time when
+        *    pages are pinned (i.e. user has touches that memory before
+        *    pinning). In such case we try to migrate them to a different zone,
+        *    but if migration fails the pages can still end-up pinned in
+        *    ZONE_MOVABLE. In such case, memory offlining might retry a long
+        *    time and will only succeed once user application unpins pages.


>
> Jason