[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201211204600.GD5487@ziepe.ca>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:46:00 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] mm/gup: migrate pinned pages out of movable zone
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:23 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 03:21:39PM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > > @@ -1593,7 +1592,7 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (!isolate_lru_page(head)) {
> > > - list_add_tail(&head->lru, &cma_page_list);
> > > + list_add_tail(&head->lru, &movable_page_list);
> > > mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(head),
> > > NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> > > page_is_file_lru(head),
> > > @@ -1605,7 +1604,7 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > i += step;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (!list_empty(&cma_page_list)) {
> > > + if (!list_empty(&movable_page_list)) {
> >
> > You didn't answer my earlier question, is it OK that ZONE_MOVABLE
> > pages leak out here if ioslate_lru_page() fails but the
> > moval_page_list is empty?
> >
> > I think the answer is no, right?
> In my opinion it is OK. We are doing our best to not pin movable
> pages, but if isolate_lru_page() fails because pages are currently
> locked by someone else, we will end up long-term pinning them.
> See comment in this patch:
> + * 1. Pinned pages: (long-term) pinning of movable pages is avoided
> + * when pages are pinned and faulted, but it is still possible that
> + * address space already has pages in ZONE_MOVABLE at the time when
> + * pages are pinned (i.e. user has touches that memory before
> + * pinning). In such case we try to migrate them to a different zone,
> + * but if migration fails the pages can still end-up pinned in
> + * ZONE_MOVABLE. In such case, memory offlining might retry a long
> + * time and will only succeed once user application unpins pages.
It is not "retry a long time" it is "might never complete" because
userspace will hold the DMA pin indefinitely.
Confused what the point of all this is then ??
I thought to goal here is to make memory unplug reliable, if you leave
a hole like this then any hostile userspace can block it forever.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists