[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X9Pao72HrNrVB5Fn@google.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:46:27 -0800
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, cang@...eaurora.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: fix memory boundary check for UFS 3.0
On 12/11, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:38:14AM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>
> >
> > If param_offset is greater than what UFS supports, it'll give kernel panic.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>
> > Change-Id: I48ea6f3f3074bd42abf4ecf8be87806732f3e6a3
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index d6a3a0ba6960..04687661d0df 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -3194,6 +3194,9 @@ int ufshcd_read_desc_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + if (param_offset > buff_len)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > /* Check whether we need temp memory */
> > if (param_offset != 0 || param_size < buff_len) {
> > desc_buf = kmalloc(buff_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > --
>
> Didn't this already get fixed by:
>
> commit 1699f980d87fb678a669490462cf0b9517c1fb47
> Author: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> Date: Wed Oct 21 22:59:00 2020 -0700
>
> scsi: ufs: Fix unexpected values from ufshcd_read_desc_param()
Oh, cool. Yes, please ignore this.
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists