[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201211135846.1334322-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:58:46 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs
Since at91_soc_init is called unconditionally from atmel_soc_device_init,
we get the following warning on all non AT91 SoCs:
" AT91: Could not find identification node"
Fix the same by filtering with allowed AT91 SoC list.
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
---
drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
v1->v2:
- Updated the allowed list as suggested by Alexandre
diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
index 55a1f57a4d8c..2dc86728b132 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
@@ -265,8 +265,20 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
return soc_dev;
}
+static const struct of_device_id at91_soc_allowed_list[] __initconst = {
+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200", },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9", },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,sama5", },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,samv7", }
+};
+
static int __init atmel_soc_device_init(void)
{
+ struct device_node *np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+
+ if (!of_match_node(at91_soc_allowed_list, np))
+ return 0;
+
at91_soc_init(socs);
return 0;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists