[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00235d6da9beddd365217aeb8add986c615762bc.camel@chronox.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:14:33 +0100
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Meng Yu <yumeng18@...wei.com>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, xuzaibo@...wei.com,
wangzhou1@...ilicon.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] crypto: hisilicon/hpre - add 'CURVE25519'
algorithm
Am Freitag, den 11.12.2020, 14:30 +0800 schrieb Meng Yu:
>
> +/* curve25519 */
> +static u64 curve25519_g_x[] = { 0x0000000000000009, 0x0000000000000000,
> + 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000 };
> +static u64 curve25519_p[] = { 0xffffffffffffffed, 0xffffffffffffffff,
> + 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x7fffffffffffffff };
> +static u64 curve25519_a[] = { 0x000000000001DB41, 0x0000000000000000,
> + 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000 };
> +static const struct ecc_curve ecc_25519 = {
> + .name = "curve25519",
> + .g = {
> + .x = curve25519_g_x,
> + .ndigits = 4,
> + },
> + .p = curve25519_p,
> + .a = curve25519_a,
> +};
With this definition, I am not sure whether ecc_is_pubkey_valid_partial would
work correctly. At least it *seems* that there would be a NULL-pointer
dereference in vli_add with the undefined .b value. Did you test and can you
confirm?
Thanks
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists