[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201211155147.GA9732@kozik-lap>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:51:47 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
Matheus Castello <matheus@...tello.eng.br>,
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <sebastian.krzyszkowiak@...i.sm>,
Angus Ainslie <angus@...ea.ca>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 18/18] power: supply: max17040: Do not enforce (incorrect)
interrupt trigger type
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 05:44:26PM +0200, Iskren Chernev wrote:
>
> On 12/11/20 9:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:25:34PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Interrupt line can be configured on different hardware in different way,
> >> even inverted. Therefore driver should not enforce specific trigger
> >> type - edge falling - but instead rely on Devicetree to configure it.
> >>
> >> The Maxim 14577/77836 datasheets describe the interrupt line as active
> >> low with a requirement of acknowledge from the CPU therefore the edge
> >> falling is not correct.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> This patch should wait till DTS changes are merged, as it relies on
> >> proper Devicetree.
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/power/supply/max17040_battery.txt | 2 +-
> >> drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/max17040_battery.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/max17040_battery.txt
> >> index c802f664b508..194eb9fe574d 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/max17040_battery.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/max17040_battery.txt
> >> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Example:
> >> reg = <0x36>;
> >> maxim,alert-low-soc-level = <10>;
> >> interrupt-parent = <&gpio7>;
> >> - interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> >> + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> >> wakeup-source;
> >> };
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c
> b/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c
> >> index d956c67d5155..f737de0470de 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c
> >> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int max17040_enable_alert_irq(struct
> max17040_chip *chip)
> >>
> >> flags = IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT;
> >
> > This has to be removed. I will fix it in v2.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
>
> I removed the IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, tweaked the DT as per the DT patch, and
> it worked on the samsung klte.
>
> I don't understand how the DT irq flag ends up being used by the kernel. It
> is never explicitly read from DT or passed to interrupt API, only i2c->irq,
> which is a pure int.
The core __setup_irq() calls irqd_get_trigger_type() on IRQ data
matching the IRQ.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists