lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Dec 2020 05:08:29 +0000
From:   cy_huang(黃啟原) <cy_huang@...htek.com>
To:     "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
        "u0084500@...il.com" <u0084500@...il.com>
CC:     "daniel.thompson@...aro.org" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] backlight: rt4831: Adds DT binding document for
 Richtek RT4831 backlight

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:40:55PM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> 於 2020年12月14日 週一
> 下午5:59寫道:
> >
> >
> > Hi CY
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:33:43AM +0800, cy_huang wrote:
> > >
> > > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
> > >
> > > Adds DT binding document for Richtek RT4831 backlight.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
> > This patch got keyword filtered and brought to my attention
> > but the rest of the series did not.
> >
> > If it was a backlight patch series you need to send it To: the
> > all the backlight maintainers.
> >
> Yes, I'm waiting for mfd reviewing.
> Due to mfd patch, I need to add backlight dt-binding patch prior to
> backlight source code.
> Or autobuild robot will said mfd dt-binding build fail from Rob.
> That's why I send the backlight dt-binding prior to the source code.
>
> I still have backlight/regulator source code patch after mfd
> reviewing.
> Do you want me to send all the patches without waiting for mfd
> reviewing?
What happened to the regulator part of the binding? I said you could
merge it into the mfd schema, not drop it. Bindings should be complete
so we get a full picture of a device.

Yes, I remove the regulator dt-binding and directly merge into mfd
schema. Could you check the v4 3/3 patch?
Or you just want me to remove regulator dt-binding example in regulator
dt-binding patch?

Sorry, please also loop my gmail account.
Due to my company mailbox, I'm not sure whether the reply format is
correct or not.

Rob
************* Email Confidentiality Notice ********************

The information contained in this e-mail message (including any attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists