[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyAzGwpXN2+cdQE=xhMP+Lm_9grvm_HUi7NfypOGcySxrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:14:25 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: don't lose the higher 32 bits of tlbs_dirty
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:20 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > In kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(), tlbs_dirty is used as:
> > need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
> > with need_tlb_flush's type being int and tlbs_dirty's type being long.
> >
> > It means that tlbs_dirty is always used as int and the higher 32 bits
> > is useless.
>
> It's probably worth noting in the changelog that it's _extremely_ unlikely this
> bug can cause problems in practice. It would require encountering tlbs_dirty
> on a 4 billion count boundary, and KVM would need to be using shadow paging or
> be running a nested guest.
You are right, I don't consider it would cause problems in practice, and I
also tried to make tlbs_dirty as "int" and found that I have to change too
many places.
And you are right it is worth noting about it, I'm sorry for neglecting.
>
> > We can just change need_tlb_flush's type to long to
> > make full use of tlbs_dirty.
>
> Hrm, this does solve the problem, but I'm not a fan of continuing to use an
> integer variable as a boolean. Rather than propagate tlbs_dirty to
> need_tlb_flush, what if this bug fix patch checks tlbs_dirty directly, and then
> a follow up patch converts need_tlb_flush to a bool and removes the unnecessary
> initialization (see below).
>
> E.g. the net result of both patches would be:
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 3abcb2ce5b7d..93b6986d3dfc 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -473,7 +473,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
> {
> struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
> - int need_tlb_flush = 0, idx;
> + bool need_tlb_flush;
> + int idx;
>
> idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> @@ -483,11 +484,10 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
> */
> kvm->mmu_notifier_count++;
> - need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
> - range->flags);
> - need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
> + need_tlb_flush = !!kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
> + range->flags);
> /* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
> - if (need_tlb_flush)
> + if (need_tlb_flush || kvm->tlbs_dirty)
> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>
> spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: a4ee1ca4a36e ("KVM: MMU: delay flush all tlbs on sync_page path")
I searched back, found it and considered adding this fixes tag, but I was
afraid that this cleanup would be backported. Is it worth backporting such
patch which is extremely hardly a problem in practice?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index 2541a17ff1c4..4e519a517e9f 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> > const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
> > {
> > struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
> > - int need_tlb_flush = 0, idx;
> > + long need_tlb_flush = 0;
>
> need_tlb_flush doesn't need to be initialized here, it's explicitly set via the
> call to kvm_unmap_hva_range().
>
> > + int idx;
> >
> > idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> > spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > --
> > 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists