linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH v2 06/14] net: mdiobus: Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcY2uOirAXGv5kFvHbNfHcZ6-gPsUMTB-_5AuBkHdu-0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:33:40 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
Cc:     Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
        Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvv@...boosystems.io>,
        Jon <jon@...id-run.com>, "linux.cj" <linux.cj@...il.com>,
        Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
        Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 06/14] net: mdiobus: Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy()

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:44 PM Calvin Johnson
<calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy() to register PHYs on the
> mdiobus. From the compatible string, identify whether the PHY is
> c45 and based on this create a PHY device instance which is
> registered on the mdiobus.

...

> +int fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy(struct mii_bus *bus,
> +                               struct fwnode_handle *child, u32 addr)
> +{
> +       struct mii_timestamper *mii_ts;
> +       struct phy_device *phy;
> +       const char *cp;
> +       bool is_c45;
> +       u32 phy_id;
> +       int rc;

> +       if (is_of_node(child)) {
> +               mii_ts = of_find_mii_timestamper(to_of_node(child));
> +               if (IS_ERR(mii_ts))
> +                       return PTR_ERR(mii_ts);
> +       }

Perhaps

               mii_ts = of_find_mii_timestamper(to_of_node(child));

> +
> +       rc = fwnode_property_read_string(child, "compatible", &cp);
> +       is_c45 = !(rc || strcmp(cp, "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"));
> +
> +       if (is_c45 || fwnode_get_phy_id(child, &phy_id))
> +               phy = get_phy_device(bus, addr, is_c45);
> +       else
> +               phy = phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id, 0, NULL);
> +       if (IS_ERR(phy)) {

> +               if (mii_ts && is_of_node(child))
> +                       unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);

if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mii_ts))
 ...

However it points to the question why unregister() doesn't handle the
above cases.
I would expect unconditional call to unregister() here.

> +               return PTR_ERR(phy);
> +       }
> +
> +       if (is_acpi_node(child)) {
> +               phy->irq = bus->irq[addr];
> +
> +               /* Associate the fwnode with the device structure so it
> +                * can be looked up later.
> +                */
> +               phy->mdio.dev.fwnode = child;
> +
> +               /* All data is now stored in the phy struct, so register it */
> +               rc = phy_device_register(phy);
> +               if (rc) {
> +                       phy_device_free(phy);
> +                       fwnode_handle_put(phy->mdio.dev.fwnode);
> +                       return rc;
> +               }
> +
> +               dev_dbg(&bus->dev, "registered phy at address %i\n", addr);
> +       } else if (is_of_node(child)) {
> +               rc = of_mdiobus_phy_device_register(bus, phy, to_of_node(child), addr);
> +               if (rc) {

> +                       if (mii_ts)
> +                               unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);

Ditto.

> +                       phy_device_free(phy);
> +                       return rc;
> +               }
> +
> +               /* phy->mii_ts may already be defined by the PHY driver. A
> +                * mii_timestamper probed via the device tree will still have
> +                * precedence.
> +                */

> +               if (mii_ts)
> +                       phy->mii_ts = mii_ts;

How is that defined? Do you need to do something with an old pointer?

> +       }
> +       return 0;
> +}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko