[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcY2uOirAXGv5kFvHbNfHcZ6-gPsUMTB-_5AuBkHdu-0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:33:40 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvv@...boosystems.io>,
Jon <jon@...id-run.com>, "linux.cj" <linux.cj@...il.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 06/14] net: mdiobus: Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy()
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:44 PM Calvin Johnson
<calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy() to register PHYs on the
> mdiobus. From the compatible string, identify whether the PHY is
> c45 and based on this create a PHY device instance which is
> registered on the mdiobus.
...
> +int fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy(struct mii_bus *bus,
> + struct fwnode_handle *child, u32 addr)
> +{
> + struct mii_timestamper *mii_ts;
> + struct phy_device *phy;
> + const char *cp;
> + bool is_c45;
> + u32 phy_id;
> + int rc;
> + if (is_of_node(child)) {
> + mii_ts = of_find_mii_timestamper(to_of_node(child));
> + if (IS_ERR(mii_ts))
> + return PTR_ERR(mii_ts);
> + }
Perhaps
mii_ts = of_find_mii_timestamper(to_of_node(child));
> +
> + rc = fwnode_property_read_string(child, "compatible", &cp);
> + is_c45 = !(rc || strcmp(cp, "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"));
> +
> + if (is_c45 || fwnode_get_phy_id(child, &phy_id))
> + phy = get_phy_device(bus, addr, is_c45);
> + else
> + phy = phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id, 0, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> + if (mii_ts && is_of_node(child))
> + unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mii_ts))
...
However it points to the question why unregister() doesn't handle the
above cases.
I would expect unconditional call to unregister() here.
> + return PTR_ERR(phy);
> + }
> +
> + if (is_acpi_node(child)) {
> + phy->irq = bus->irq[addr];
> +
> + /* Associate the fwnode with the device structure so it
> + * can be looked up later.
> + */
> + phy->mdio.dev.fwnode = child;
> +
> + /* All data is now stored in the phy struct, so register it */
> + rc = phy_device_register(phy);
> + if (rc) {
> + phy_device_free(phy);
> + fwnode_handle_put(phy->mdio.dev.fwnode);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(&bus->dev, "registered phy at address %i\n", addr);
> + } else if (is_of_node(child)) {
> + rc = of_mdiobus_phy_device_register(bus, phy, to_of_node(child), addr);
> + if (rc) {
> + if (mii_ts)
> + unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);
Ditto.
> + phy_device_free(phy);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + /* phy->mii_ts may already be defined by the PHY driver. A
> + * mii_timestamper probed via the device tree will still have
> + * precedence.
> + */
> + if (mii_ts)
> + phy->mii_ts = mii_ts;
How is that defined? Do you need to do something with an old pointer?
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists