lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:13:20 -0800
From:   Dhaval Giani <>
To:     Joel Fernandes <>,
        chris hyser <>
Cc:     Nishanth Aravamudan <>,
        Julien Desfossez <>,
        Peter Zijlstra <>,
        Tim Chen <>,
        Vineeth Pillai <>,
        Aaron Lu <>,
        Aubrey Li <>,,,,,,,
        Phil Auld <>,
        Valentin Schneider <>,
        Mel Gorman <>,
        Pawan Gupta <>,
        Paolo Bonzini <>,,
        Chen Yu <>,
        Christian Brauner <>,
        Agata Gruza <>,
        Antonio Gomez Iglesias <>,,,,,,,,
        Alexandre Chartre <>,,,
        Junaid Shahid <>,,
        Ben Segall <>, Josh Don <>,
        Hao Luo <>,
        Tom Lendacky <>,
        Aubrey Li <>,
        Tim Chen <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 23/32] sched: Add a per-thread core scheduling

On 12/14/20 3:25 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:

>> No problem. That was there primarily for debugging.
> Ok. I squashed Josh's changes into this patch and several of my fixups. So
> there'll be 3 patches:
> 1. CGroup + prctl  (single patch as it is hell to split it)

Please don't do that. I am not sure we have thought the cgroup interface through
(looking at all the discussions). IMHO, it would be better for us to get a simpler
interface (prctl) right and then once we learn the lessons using it, apply it for
the cgroup interface. I think we all agree we don't want to maintain a messy interface


Powered by blists - more mailing lists