[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <796ec1e5-15ef-34da-5716-0ec19432deba@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:13:20 -0800
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...cle.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
chris hyser <chris.hyser@...cle.com>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, kerrnel@...gle.com,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, vineeth@...byteword.org,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@...el.com>,
Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@...el.com>,
graf@...zon.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, dfaggioli@...e.com,
pjt@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, derkling@...gle.com,
benbjiang@...cent.com,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, OWeisse@...ch.edu,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>, jsbarnes@...gle.com,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 23/32] sched: Add a per-thread core scheduling
interface
On 12/14/20 3:25 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> No problem. That was there primarily for debugging.
> Ok. I squashed Josh's changes into this patch and several of my fixups. So
> there'll be 3 patches:
> 1. CGroup + prctl (single patch as it is hell to split it)
Please don't do that. I am not sure we have thought the cgroup interface through
(looking at all the discussions). IMHO, it would be better for us to get a simpler
interface (prctl) right and then once we learn the lessons using it, apply it for
the cgroup interface. I think we all agree we don't want to maintain a messy interface
forever.
Dhaval
Powered by blists - more mailing lists