lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:04:26 +0100
From:   Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the microblaze tree

Hi Stephen,

On 16. 12. 20 2:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:03:23 +0100 Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu> wrote:
>>
>> On 10. 12. 20 5:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in:
>>>
>>>   arch/microblaze/Kconfig
>>>   arch/microblaze/mm/Makefile
>>>
>>> between commit:
>>>
>>>   05cdf457477d ("microblaze: Remove noMMU code")
>>>
>>> from the microblaze tree and commit:
>>>
>>>   7ac1b26b0a72 ("microblaze/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic")
>>>
>>> from the tip tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>>> complex conflicts.
>>>   
>>
>> Thanks for letting me know. I will mentioned it to Linus.
>> Your resolution is correct.
> 
> These are now conflicts between the microblaze tree and Linus' tree.
> 

Yes. I am just preparing pull request to Linus with mentioning
resolution as you sent last time.

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs
U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP/Versal SoCs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists