[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201216120025.3901896a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:00:25 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the microblaze
tree
Hi all,
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:03:23 +0100 Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu> wrote:
>
> On 10. 12. 20 5:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in:
> >
> > arch/microblaze/Kconfig
> > arch/microblaze/mm/Makefile
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 05cdf457477d ("microblaze: Remove noMMU code")
> >
> > from the microblaze tree and commit:
> >
> > 7ac1b26b0a72 ("microblaze/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic")
> >
> > from the tip tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
>
> Thanks for letting me know. I will mentioned it to Linus.
> Your resolution is correct.
These are now conflicts between the microblaze tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists