| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:35:25 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Cc: marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com, matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
bgolaszewski@...libre.com, khiem.nguyen.xt@...esas.com,
linux-power@...rohmeurope.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/12] mfd: bd9571mwv: Make the driver more generic
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> From: Khiem Nguyen <khiem.nguyen.xt@...esas.com>
>
> Since the driver supports BD9571MWV PMIC only,
> this patch makes the functions and data structure become more generic
> so that it can support other PMIC variants as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Khiem Nguyen <khiem.nguyen.xt@...esas.com>
> [shimoda: rebase and refactor]
This is kind of expected. Please just add Co-developed-by instead.
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/bd9571mwv.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> include/linux/mfd/bd9571mwv.h | 18 ++------
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/bd9571mwv.c b/drivers/mfd/bd9571mwv.c
> index 49e968e..ccf1a60 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/bd9571mwv.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/bd9571mwv.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> * ROHM BD9571MWV-M MFD driver
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2017 Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Renesas Electronics Corporation
> *
> * Based on the TPS65086 driver
> */
> @@ -14,6 +15,19 @@
>
> #include <linux/mfd/bd9571mwv.h>
>
> +/**
This is wrong. Please do not abuse kernel-doc formatting.
> + * struct bd957x_data - internal data for the bd957x driverbd957x_data
> + *
> + * Internal data to distinguish bd957x variants
> + */
> +struct bd957x_data {
Call this bd957x_ddata please.
ddata == driver data.
> + char *part_name;
What is this used for besides a print? Those kinds of log messages
are usually frowned upon anyway. Probably best to just remove the
print, along with the variable.
> + const struct regmap_config *regmap_config;
> + const struct regmap_irq_chip *irq_chip;
> + const struct mfd_cell *cells;
> + int num_cells;
> +};
> +
> static const struct mfd_cell bd9571mwv_cells[] = {
> { .name = "bd9571mwv-regulator", },
> { .name = "bd9571mwv-gpio", },
> @@ -102,13 +116,21 @@ static struct regmap_irq_chip bd9571mwv_irq_chip = {
> .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bd9571mwv_irqs),
> };
>
> -static int bd9571mwv_identify(struct bd9571mwv *bd)
> +static const struct bd957x_data bd9571mwv_data = {
> + .part_name = BD9571MWV_PART_NAME,
> + .regmap_config = &bd9571mwv_regmap_config,
> + .irq_chip = &bd9571mwv_irq_chip,
> + .cells = bd9571mwv_cells,
> + .num_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(bd9571mwv_cells),
> +};
> +
> +static int bd9571mwv_identify(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap,
I guess this function name also needs to change?
And all other occurences of bd9571mwv?
> + const char *part_name)
> {
> - struct device *dev = bd->dev;
> unsigned int value;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = regmap_read(bd->regmap, BD9571MWV_VENDOR_CODE, &value);
> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, BD9571MWV_VENDOR_CODE, &value);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to read vendor code register (ret=%i)\n",
> ret);
> @@ -121,27 +143,20 @@ static int bd9571mwv_identify(struct bd9571mwv *bd)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - ret = regmap_read(bd->regmap, BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE, &value);
> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE, &value);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to read product code register (ret=%i)\n",
> ret);
> return ret;
> }
> -
> - if (value != BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE_VAL) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Invalid product code ID %02x (expected %02x)\n",
> - value, BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE_VAL);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - ret = regmap_read(bd->regmap, BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_REVISION, &value);
> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_REVISION, &value);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to read revision register (ret=%i)\n",
> ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> - dev_info(dev, "Device: BD9571MWV rev. %d\n", value & 0xff);
> + dev_info(dev, "Device: %s rev. %d\n", part_name, value & 0xff);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -149,38 +164,48 @@ static int bd9571mwv_identify(struct bd9571mwv *bd)
> static int bd9571mwv_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *ids)
> {
> - struct bd9571mwv *bd;
> - int ret;
> -
> - bd = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*bd), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!bd)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - i2c_set_clientdata(client, bd);
> - bd->dev = &client->dev;
> - bd->irq = client->irq;
> + const struct bd957x_data *data;
ddata
> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> + int ret, irq = client->irq;
> +
> + /* Read the PMIC product code */
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed reading at 0x%02x\n",
> + BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE);
"Failed to read product code" is more user friendly.
> + return ret;
> + }
> + switch (ret) {
> + case BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE_VAL:
Suggest:
s/BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE/BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE_CMD/
then
s/BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE_VAL/BD9571MWV_PRODUCT_CODE/
> + data = &bd9571mwv_data;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_err(dev, "Unsupported device 0x%x\n", ret);
> + return -ENOENT;
ENOENT == "No such file or directory"
I think you mean -ENODEV.
> + }
>
> - bd->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &bd9571mwv_regmap_config);
> - if (IS_ERR(bd->regmap)) {
> - dev_err(bd->dev, "Failed to initialize register map\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(bd->regmap);
> + regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, data->regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize register map\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> }
>
> - ret = bd9571mwv_identify(bd);
> + ret = bd9571mwv_identify(dev, regmap, data->part_name);
Just pass ddata, then you'll have 'dev' and 'regmap'.
I'd remove 'part_name' completely.
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(bd->dev, bd->regmap, bd->irq,
> - IRQF_ONESHOT, 0, &bd9571mwv_irq_chip,
> - &bd->irq_data);
> + ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(dev, regmap, irq, IRQF_ONESHOT, 0,
> + data->irq_chip, &irq_data);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(bd->dev, "Failed to register IRQ chip\n");
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register IRQ chip\n");
> return ret;
> }
>
> - return devm_mfd_add_devices(bd->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> - bd9571mwv_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(bd9571mwv_cells),
> - NULL, 0, regmap_irq_get_domain(bd->irq_data));
> + return devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, data->cells,
> + data->num_cells, NULL, 0,
> + regmap_irq_get_domain(irq_data));
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id bd9571mwv_of_match_table[] = {
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/bd9571mwv.h b/include/linux/mfd/bd9571mwv.h
> index bcc7092..5ab976a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/bd9571mwv.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/bd9571mwv.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> * ROHM BD9571MWV-M driver
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2017 Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Renesas Electronics Corporation
> *
> * Based on the TPS65086 driver
> */
> @@ -83,6 +84,8 @@
>
> #define BD9571MWV_ACCESS_KEY 0xff
>
> +#define BD9571MWV_PART_NAME "BD9571MWV"
> +
> /* Define the BD9571MWV IRQ numbers */
> enum bd9571mwv_irqs {
> BD9571MWV_IRQ_MD1,
> @@ -94,19 +97,4 @@ enum bd9571mwv_irqs {
> BD9571MWV_IRQ_WDT_OF,
> BD9571MWV_IRQ_BKUP_TRG,
> };
> -
> -/**
> - * struct bd9571mwv - state holder for the bd9571mwv driver
> - *
> - * Device data may be used to access the BD9571MWV chip
> - */
> -struct bd9571mwv {
> - struct device *dev;
> - struct regmap *regmap;
> -
> - /* IRQ Data */
> - int irq;
> - struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> -};
> -
> #endif /* __LINUX_MFD_BD9571MWV_H */
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists