linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] Update to zstd-1.4.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:50:52 +0100
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Nick Terrell <nickrterrell@...il.com>,
        "squashfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <squashfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Yann Collet <cyan@...com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Petr Malat <oss@...at.biz>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        Niket Agarwal <niketa@...com>,
        Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] Update to zstd-1.4.6

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:58:07AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:48:51AM +0000, Nick Terrell wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the advice! The first zstd patches went through Herbert’s tree, which is
> > why I’ve sent them this way.
> 
> Sorry, but I'm not touch these patches as Christoph's objections
> don't seem to have been addressed.

I have objections to the current patchset as well, the build bot has
found that some of the function frames are overly large (up to 3800
bytes) [1], besides the original complaint that the patch 3/3 is 1.5MiB.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201204140314.GS6430@twin.jikos.cz/