lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201217203211.GB643756@sasha-vm>
Date:   Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:32:11 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Young Hsieh <youngh@...r.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Question for AMD patches

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:05:45AM +0800, Young Hsieh wrote:
>Hello,
>
>This is Young Hsieh from Uber and currently I am in Uber infra team and in charge of server system design. Nice to e-meet you!  :)
>
>We are working on AMD Milan platform with Debian, and notice there are some patches for performance and security improvements, which are not implemented in LTS kernels (4.14/4.19/5.4) yet. On our side, we prefer to use the general LTS kernel release instead of a customized kernel, in case we will not align on major fixes down the road. So would like to know if there is any plan to backport these patches and if so, what is the timeline?  Thanks a lot again for any advice.

Easy: use 5.10. It's LTS and has all the patches you care about.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ