linux-kernel - Re: Question for AMD patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Dec 2020 21:35:57 +0100
From:   Greg K-H <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Young Hsieh <youngh@...r.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:     x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Question for AMD patches

What exact commits are you referring to?

And you do know about the rules for stable kernel patches, right?

greg k-h

On December 17, 2020 9:05:45 PM GMT+01:00, Young Hsieh <youngh@...r.com> wrote:
>Hello, 
>
>This is Young Hsieh from Uber and currently I am in Uber infra team and in charge of server system design. Nice to e-meet you!  :)
>
>We are working on AMD Milan platform with Debian, and notice there are some patches for performance and security improvements, which are not implemented in LTS kernels (4.14/4.19/5.4) yet. On our side, we prefer to use the general LTS kernel release instead of a customized kernel, in case we will not align on major fixes down the road. So would like to know if there is any plan to backport these patches and if so, what is the timeline?  Thanks a lot again for any advice.  
>
>Cheers,
>****************************************
>Young Hsieh
>Uber Hardware Engineer
>****************************************