lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:54:47 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, ning.sun@...el.com,
        kumar.n.dwarakanath@...el.com,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support AES algorithm using
 Key Locker instructions

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:46 AM Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Key Locker (KL) is Intel's new security feature that protects the AES key
> at the time of data transformation. New AES SIMD instructions -- as a
> successor of Intel's AES-NI -- are provided to encode an AES key and
> reference it for the AES algorithm.
>
> New instructions support 128/256-bit keys. While it is not desirable to
> receive any 192-bit key, AES-NI instructions are taken to serve this size.
>
> New instructions are operational in both 32-/64-bit modes.
>
> Add a set of new macros for the new instructions so that no new binutils
> version is required.
>
> Implemented methods are for a single block as well as ECB, CBC, CTR, and
> XTS modes. The methods are not compatible with other AES implementations as
> accessing an encrypted key instead of the normal AES key.
>
> setkey() call encodes an AES key. User may displace the AES key once
> encoded, as encrypt()/decrypt() methods do not need the key.
>
> Most C code follows the AES-NI implementation. It has higher priority than
> the AES-NI as providing key protection.

What does this patch *do*?

IKL gives a few special key slots that have certain restrictions and
certain security properties.  What can you use them for?  With this
series installed, what is the user-visible effect?  Is there a new
API?  Do you use them with the netlink user crypto interface?  Do you
use them for encrypting disks?  Swap?  How?  How do you allocate,
reset, and free keys?  Who has permissions to use them?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ