linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: ufs: Refactor cancelling clkscaling works

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a96e3c62a0a77c78285fe92f2db2cd3@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:08:35 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        avri.altman@....com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        beanhuo@...ron.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, bvanassche@....org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
        chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com,
        chaotian.jing@...iatek.com, cc.chou@...iatek.com,
        jiajie.hao@...iatek.com, alice.chao@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: ufs: Refactor cancelling clkscaling works

On 2020-12-16 21:16, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Cancelling suspend_work and resume_work is only required while
> suspending clk-scaling. Thus moving these two invokes into
> ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling() function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 17 ++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 052479a56a6f..a91b73a1fc48 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -1451,6 +1451,9 @@ static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct 
> ufs_hba *hba)
>  	if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
>  		return;
> 
> +	cancel_work_sync(&hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work);
> +	cancel_work_sync(&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work);
> +
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
>  	if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended) {
>  		suspend = true;
> @@ -1514,9 +1517,6 @@ static ssize_t
> ufshcd_clkscale_enable_store(struct device *dev,
>  	pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev);
>  	ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
> 
> -	cancel_work_sync(&hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work);
> -	cancel_work_sync(&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work);
> -
>  	if (value) {
>  		ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(hba);
>  	} else {
> @@ -5663,11 +5663,8 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handling_prepare(struct
> ufs_hba *hba)
>  		ufshcd_vops_resume(hba, UFS_RUNTIME_PM);
>  	} else {
>  		ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
> -		if (hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled) {
> -			cancel_work_sync(&hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work);
> -			cancel_work_sync(&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work);
> +		if (hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled)
>  			ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba);
> -		}
>  	}
>  	down_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
>  	hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = false;
> @@ -8512,11 +8509,9 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>  	ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
>  	hba->clk_gating.is_suspended = true;
> 
> -	if (hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled) {
> -		cancel_work_sync(&hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work);
> -		cancel_work_sync(&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work);
> +	if (hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled)
>  		ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba);
> -	}
> +
>  	down_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
>  	hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = false;
>  	up_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);

Reviewed-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>