lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:14:35 +0000
From:   "Alice Guo (OSS)" <alice.guo@....nxp.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "Alice Guo (OSS)" <alice.guo@....nxp.com>
CC:     "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: imx8m: add DT Binding doc for
 soc unique ID



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Sent: 2020年12月18日 17:37
> To: Alice Guo (OSS) <alice.guo@....nxp.com>
> Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org; shawnguo@...nel.org; s.hauer@...gutronix.de;
> kernel@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: imx8m: add DT Binding doc for soc
> unique ID
> 
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:05:00AM +0000, Alice Guo (OSS) wrote:
>  > > +    required:
> > > > +      - compatible
> > > > +      - nvmem-cells
> > > > +      - nvmem-cell-names
> > > > +
> > > > +additionalProperties: true
> > >
> > > Don't leave comments unresolved (or resolve them against review
> > > without discussion). Rob asked for changing it. The same as with all
> > > schemas - you need to describe the missing properties.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Krzysztof
> >
> > Hi,
> > Thank you for your advice. I replied to him and let him know I remained here
> unchanged. There will be errors according to his suggestion.
> 
> Then the solution is to correct the errors - describe missing properties
> - instead of ignoring the suggestion and making a resubmit right away.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hi,
I am sorry I do not DT Binding doc very well.

I checked the usage of patternProperties and additionalProperties in https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/object.html.
I noticed a sentence on the website: " If additionalProperties is a boolean and set to false, no additional properties will be allowed.", so I think that
if additionalProperties is a boolean and set to true, additional properties will be allowed. Letting here unchanged is my solution to correct the errors.
I am not sure, I asked Rob for advice on the v6 by email, but he didn't reply to me, so I made a resubmit.

Thank you for your comment again.

Best regards,
Alice

Powered by blists - more mailing lists