linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for the MediaTek MT6359 PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:04:25 +0800
From:   Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Ran Bi <ran.bi@...iatek.com>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Yuchen Huang <yuchen.huang@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        "Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>,
        Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for the
 MediaTek MT6359 PMIC

Hi,

On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 13:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:47:01 +0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> > This adds compatible for the MediaTek MT6359 PMIC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt | 7 ++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 
Sorry, the tag disappeared because of the change of rtc compatible name.
I will list the change in the each patch for the next update.
Thanks for your review.