[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201219215139.GA29536@amd>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 22:51:39 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.9 14/49] net: stmmac: dwmac-meson8b: fix mask
definition of the m250_sel mux
Hi!
> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 82ca4c922b8992013a238d65cf4e60cc33e12f36 ]
>
> The m250_sel mux clock uses bit 4 in the PRG_ETH0 register. Fix this by
> shifting the PRG_ETH0_CLK_M250_SEL_MASK accordingly as the "mask" in
> struct clk_mux expects the mask relative to the "shift" field in the
> same struct.
>
> While here, get rid of the PRG_ETH0_CLK_M250_SEL_SHIFT macro and use
> __ffs() to determine it from the existing PRG_ETH0_CLK_M250_SEL_MASK
> macro.
I can't say I like this one:
> clk_configs->m250_mux.reg = dwmac->regs + PRG_ETH0;
> - clk_configs->m250_mux.shift = PRG_ETH0_CLK_M250_SEL_SHIFT;
> - clk_configs->m250_mux.mask = PRG_ETH0_CLK_M250_SEL_MASK;
> + clk_configs->m250_mux.shift = __ffs(PRG_ETH0_CLK_M250_SEL_MASK);
It replaces constant with computation done at runtime; compiler can't
optimize it as __ffs is implemented with asm().
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists