[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCBRe3Oacqce1EDQpoNmEhXeUxJrA43RTA0+_fVciDJzhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 23:38:25 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.9 14/49] net: stmmac: dwmac-meson8b: fix mask definition
of the m250_sel mux
Hi Pavel,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:51 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
[...]
> I can't say I like this one:
>
>
> > clk_configs->m250_mux.reg = dwmac->regs + PRG_ETH0;
> > - clk_configs->m250_mux.shift = PRG_ETH0_CLK_M250_SEL_SHIFT;
> > - clk_configs->m250_mux.mask = PRG_ETH0_CLK_M250_SEL_MASK;
> > + clk_configs->m250_mux.shift = __ffs(PRG_ETH0_CLK_M250_SEL_MASK);
>
> It replaces constant with computation done at runtime; compiler can't
> optimize it as __ffs is implemented with asm().
what do you suggest to use instead?
personally I don't see a problem because this is only called once at
driver probe time.
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists