[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201219224312.380126-1-daniel.west.dev@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 14:43:12 -0800
From: Daniel West <daniel.west.dev@...il.com>
To: Larry.Finger@...inger.net
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, insafonov@...il.com,
daniel.west.dev@...il.com, gustavoars@...nel.org,
andrealmeidap1996@...il.com, yepeilin.cs@...il.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8455/8455] staging: rtl8188eu: core: fixed a comment format issue.
Fixed a checkpatch warning:
WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
#4595: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:4595:
+/****************************************************************************
+
The code is full of comments like this. Should the coding style
be inforced here, even when there is a logic to the way the code
was broken up?
Signed-off-by: Daniel West <daniel.west.dev@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index 8794907a39f4..adf2788a416f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
@@ -4591,11 +4591,10 @@ void mlmeext_sta_del_event_callback(struct adapter *padapter)
}
}
-/****************************************************************************
-
-Following are the functions for the timer handlers
-
-*****************************************************************************/
+/*
+ *
+ *Following are the functions for the timer handlers
+ */
static u8 chk_ap_is_alive(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
{
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists