[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201220152921.dqlsmqfvygtpzj5b@kari-VirtualBox>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:29:21 +0200
From: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
To: Daniel West <daniel.west.dev@...il.com>
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
insafonov@...il.com, gustavoars@...nel.org,
andrealmeidap1996@...il.com, yepeilin.cs@...il.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8455/8455] staging: rtl8188eu: core: fixed a comment
format issue.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 02:43:12PM -0800, Daniel West wrote:
> Fixed a checkpatch warning:
>
> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
> #4595: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:4595:
> +/****************************************************************************
> +
>
> The code is full of comments like this. Should the coding style
> be inforced here, even when there is a logic to the way the code
> was broken up?
You should make one patch which atleast fix one file at ones. It would
be even better if it fixes whole stuff (example one driver) right a way.
Also note that you should not but this kind messages to your patch
message. If you want to note this kind of thing you can use --- and
after that it will not included in patch itself. You can read it online
more.
Also where does this [PATCH 8455/8455] even come from? Good thing is
that you really didn't send so many patches or atleast I won't see them.
And it seems that you are new so welcome a board :)
--
Kari Argillander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists