[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201221085055.GC4825@dell>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:50:55 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Convert bindings to .yaml
format
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> Convert the bindings from .txt to .yaml format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.txt | 80 -------------
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
What are the other patches that I was not cc'ed on?
Generally it's a bad idea to send only some patches of a set to some
maintainers. Best for everyone to have full visibility.
Also looks like you're missing a cover-letter [PATCH 0/4] which adds
to the opaqueness/confusion.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists