linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Convert bindings to .yaml format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0281ad230dca093d42776cc64f56d3f9@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Dec 2020 12:23:43 +0530
From:   kgunda@...eaurora.org
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Convert bindings to .yaml
 format

On 2020-12-21 14:20, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> 
>> Convert the bindings from .txt to .yaml format.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.txt     |  80 
>> -------------
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml    | 127 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.txt
>>  create mode 100644 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> 
> What are the other patches that I was not cc'ed on?
> 
> Generally it's a bad idea to send only some patches of a set to some
> maintainers.  Best for everyone to have full visibility.
> 
I ran the get_maintainer.pl script. Not sure how it is missed. Anyways
I will add you in the next post.

> Also looks like you're missing a cover-letter [PATCH 0/4] which adds
> to the opaqueness/confusion.
I have introduced the cover letter from V3 series. That's why the 
earlier
notes are missing from cover letter. Let me add them in next series.