linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 21 Dec 2020 20:09:47 +0530
From:   Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        linux-amarula <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M
 Mini C.TOUCH 2.0

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam.
> > > >
> > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive
> > > > touch interface support.
> > > >
> > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for
> > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board.
> > > >
> > > > Add bindings for it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes for v2:
> > > > - updated commit message
> > > >
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties:
> > > >          items:
> > > >            - enum:
> > > >                - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit  # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit
> > > > +              - engicam,icore-mx8mm               # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM
> > > > +              - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2       # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0
> > >
> > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't
> > > match.
> >
> > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here.
> >
> > This the dts file ie used matched compatible.
> > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm",
> >                      "fsl,imx8mm";
> >
> > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like,
> >
> > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> > ...
> >
> >     From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml
> >   DTC     arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb
> >   DTC     arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb
> >   DTC     arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb
> > ..
> >
> > Can you let me know what I missed here?
>
> You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or
> something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit
> the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES.
>
> I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1
> at patch #5. No changes here stil.

Yes, I usually did that check before posting. Please check the build
log below and fsl.yaml binding is fine to build.

# make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=arm/fsl.yaml
  HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/dtc.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/flattree.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/fstree.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/data.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/livetree.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/treesource.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/srcpos.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/checks.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/util.o
  LEX     scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c
  YACC    scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.[ch]
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o
  HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/yamltree.o
  HOSTLD  scripts/dtc/dtc
  CHKDT   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json
/w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml:
'additionalProperties' is a required property
/w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml:
'additionalProperties' is a required property
/w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml:
'additionalProperties' is a required property
/w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml:
'additionalProperties' is a required property
  SCHEMA  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json
/w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml:
ignoring, error in schema:
warning: no schema found in file:
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml
/w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml:
ignoring, error in schema:
warning: no schema found in file:
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml
/w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: ignoring,
error in schema:
warning: no schema found in file:
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml
/w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml:
ignoring, error in schema:
warning: no schema found in file:
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml
#

Jagan.