linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: Update powerpc's syscall.tbl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201221234755.GC433286@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Dec 2020 20:47:55 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: Update powerpc's syscall.tbl

Em Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:08:56PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:26:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:59:23PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang escreveu:
> > > > This silences the following tools/perf/ build warning:
> > > > Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl' differs from latest version at 'arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl'
> > > 
> > > Hi Ravi, Naveen,
> > > 
> > > 	Can I get your Reviewed-by or Acked-by for this change and the
> > > other that adds s390's syscall.tbl to check_headers.sh so that we get
> > 
> > oops s/s390/powerpc/g :-)
> > 
> > > notified when the copy drifts, so that we can see if it still continues
> > > working and we can get new syscalls to be supported in things like 'perf
> > > trace'?
> 
> Yes, this looks good to me:
> Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> FWIW, I had posted a similar patch back in April, but glad to have this go
> in ;)
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220063740.785913-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

My bad :-\
 
> 
> Thanks,
> Naveen
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo