[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1608301824.eljlhiafee.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:08:56 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: Update powerpc's syscall.tbl
Hi Arnaldo,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:26:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:59:23PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang escreveu:
>> > This silences the following tools/perf/ build warning:
>> > Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl' differs from latest version at 'arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl'
>>
>> Hi Ravi, Naveen,
>>
>> Can I get your Reviewed-by or Acked-by for this change and the
>> other that adds s390's syscall.tbl to check_headers.sh so that we get
>
> oops s/s390/powerpc/g :-)
>
>> notified when the copy drifts, so that we can see if it still continues
>> working and we can get new syscalls to be supported in things like 'perf
>> trace'?
Yes, this looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
FWIW, I had posted a similar patch back in April, but glad to have this
go in ;)
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220063740.785913-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thanks,
Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists