[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201223085153.GA30643@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 08:51:53 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
anan.sun@...iatek.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
srv_heupstream@...iatek.com, chao.hao@...iatek.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...gle.com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] iommu: Move iotlb_sync_map out from __iommu_map
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 06:36:01PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> In the end of __iommu_map, It alway call iotlb_sync_map.
> This patch moves iotlb_sync_map out from __iommu_map since it is
> unnecessary to call this for each sg segment especially iotlb_sync_map
> is flush tlb all currently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
What about adding a little helper that does the NULL check and method
call instead of duplicating it all over?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists