lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Dec 2020 11:41:04 +0000
From:   Artur Petrosyan <Arthur.Petrosyan@...opsys.com>
To:     Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@...ray.eu>,
        Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>
CC:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: dwc2: Try usb_get_phy_by_phandle instead of
 usb_get_phy

Hi Jules,

On 12/16/2020 20:59, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> On probe the dwc2 driver tries two path to get an usb phy, first calling
> devm_phy_get() and secondly with devm_usb_get_phy().
> 
> However the current implementation of devm_phy_get() never return a valid
> phy for usb-nop-xceiv. And the current implementation of devm_usb_get_phy
> only check for phy that's has already been registered.
> 
> During boot, I see the dwc2 driver being probed before the usb-nop-xceiv
> probe, this means that during the dwc2 probe the function devm_usb_get_phy
> never finds the a phy (because it hasn't been registered yet) but never
> cause the dwc2 probe to defer.
> 
> I tried to follow what is done by dwc3_core_get_phy(): if the current
> device has an of_node then try to get the usb_phy by phandle instead of
> using devm_usb_get_phy(). This way when the probe order is not good the
> devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle() function will return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@...ray.eu>
> --- 8< ---
> 
> A snippet of the device-tree source I am using:
>          &usb0 {
>                  phys = <&usb_phy0>;
>                  phy-names = "usb2-phy";
>          };
>          &usb_phy0 {
>                  #phy-cells = <0>;
>                  compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
>                  reset-gpios = <&gpio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>          };
> ---
>   drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c | 7 ++++++-
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c
> index db9fd4bd1a38..b58ce996add7 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c
> @@ -251,7 +251,12 @@ static int dwc2_lowlevel_hw_init(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (!hsotg->phy) {
> -		hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy(hsotg->dev, USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
> +		if (hsotg->dev->of_node)
> +			i = of_property_match_string(hsotg->dev->of_node, "phy-names", "usb2-phy");

According the device tree you have provided the value of "i" will always 
be "0".

> +		if (hsotg->dev->of_node && i >= 0)
> +			hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(hsotg->dev, "phys", i);

Why do you use the value of "i" while in "<&usb_phy0>" you have only one 
phy. If you had several phy-names and the value of "i" gets more than 0, 
then based on your usb_phy0 "devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle" function will 
return error. So, maybe it would be more correct (based on your device 
tree), to use below command
hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(hsotg->dev, "phys", 0);

> +		else
> +			hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy(hsotg->dev, USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
>   		if (IS_ERR(hsotg->uphy)) {
>   			ret = PTR_ERR(hsotg->uphy);
>   			switch (ret) {
> 

Regards,
Artur

Powered by blists - more mailing lists