[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201226134522.fqpsd2fzlri2rcni@tellis.lin.mbt.kalray.eu>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 14:45:44 +0100
From: Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@...ray.eu>
To: Artur Petrosyan <Arthur.Petrosyan@...opsys.com>
Cc: Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: dwc2: Try usb_get_phy_by_phandle instead of
usb_get_phy
Hi Artur,
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:41:04AM +0000, Artur Petrosyan wrote:
> > @@ -251,7 +251,12 @@ static int dwc2_lowlevel_hw_init(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
> > }
> >
> > if (!hsotg->phy) {
> > - hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy(hsotg->dev, USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
> > + if (hsotg->dev->of_node)
> > + i = of_property_match_string(hsotg->dev->of_node, "phy-names", "usb2-phy");
>
> According the device tree you have provided the value of "i" will always
> be "0".
Yes
> > + if (hsotg->dev->of_node && i >= 0)
> > + hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(hsotg->dev, "phys", i);
>
> Why do you use the value of "i" while in "<&usb_phy0>" you have only one
> phy. If you had several phy-names and the value of "i" gets more than 0,
> then based on your usb_phy0 "devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle" function will
> return error. So, maybe it would be more correct (based on your device
> tree), to use below command
> hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(hsotg->dev, "phys", 0);
Yes I could use 0 instead of i, but I would like this to work not only
for my case where the "usb2-phy" phandle comes first.
I've tried to follow what's done in phy-core.c, as done by the function
phy_get. Where it first call "of_property_match_string" and then get the
phy with the matched index.
I don't see how, in my case, the function "devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle" can
be called with i greater than 0, and returning an error.
Best,
Jules
Powered by blists - more mailing lists