[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201228225544.GH4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 00:55:44 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...ica.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jordan Hand <jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/14] ipu3-cio2: Add cio2-bridge to ipu3-cio2 driver
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:37:38PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> On 28/12/2020 17:05, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:54:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> >>> +#include <linux/property.h>
> >>> +
> >>> +#define CIO2_HID "INT343E"
> >>> +#define CIO2_NUM_PORTS 4
> >
> > This is already defined in ipu3-cio2.h. Could you include that instead?
>
> Yes; but I'd need to also include media/v4l2-device.h and
> media/videobuf2-dma-sg.h (they're included in ipu3-cio2-main.c at the
> moment). It didn't seem worth it; but I can move those two includes from
> the .c to the .h and then include ipu3-cio2.h in cio2-bridge.h
>
> Which do you prefer?
Actually ipu3-cio2.h misses a lot of inclusions (like mutex.h which I
immediately noticed when scrolled over data types). I think here should be a
compromise variant, split out something like ipu3-cio2-defs.h which can be
included in both ipu3-cio2.h and cio2-bridge.h.
And cio2-bridge.h needs more inclusions like types.h.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists