[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X+yl57S8vuU2pRil@google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 08:08:07 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, pbonzini@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.lendacky@....com, peterz@...radead.org, joro@...tes.org,
x86@...nel.org, kyung.min.park@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com,
hpa@...or.com, mgross@...ux.intel.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
kim.phillips@....com, wei.huang2@....com, jmattson@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: SVM: Add support for Virtual SPEC_CTRL
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 04:31:55PM -0600, Babu Moger wrote:
> > @@ -2549,7 +2559,10 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> > !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
> > return 1;
> >
> > - msr_info->data = svm->spec_ctrl;
> > + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL))
> > + msr_info->data = svm->vmcb->save.spec_ctrl;
> > + else
> > + msr_info->data = svm->spec_ctrl;
> > break;
> > case MSR_AMD64_VIRT_SPEC_CTRL:
> > if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> > @@ -2640,6 +2653,8 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
> > return 1;
> >
> > svm->spec_ctrl = data;
> > + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL))
> > + svm->vmcb->save.spec_ctrl = data;
> > if (!data)
> > break;
> >
>
> Are the get/set_msr() accessors such a fast path that they need
> static_cpu_has() ?
Nope, they can definitely use boot_cpu_has().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists