[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201231200913.GA32313@amd>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:09:13 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 287/346] crypto: ecdh - avoid unaligned accesses in
ecdh_set_secret()
Hi!
> ecdh_set_secret() casts a void* pointer to a const u64* in order to
> feed it into ecc_is_key_valid(). This is not generally permitted by
> the C standard, and leads to actual misalignment faults on ARMv6
> cores. In some cases, these are fixed up in software, but this still
> leads to performance hits that are entirely avoidable.
>
> So let's copy the key into the ctx buffer first, which we will do
> anyway in the common case, and which guarantees correct alignment.
Fair enough... but: params.key_size is validated in
ecc_is_key_valid(), and that now happens _after_ memcpy.
How is it guaranteed that we don't overflow the buffer during memcpy?
> +++ b/crypto/ecdh.c
> @@ -57,12 +57,13 @@ static int ecdh_set_secret(struct crypto
> return ecc_gen_privkey(ctx->curve_id, ctx->ndigits,
> ctx->private_key);
>
> - if (ecc_is_key_valid(ctx->curve_id, ctx->ndigits,
> - (const u64 *)params.key, params.key_size) < 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> memcpy(ctx->private_key, params.key, params.key_size);
>
> + if (ecc_is_key_valid(ctx->curve_id, ctx->ndigits,
> + ctx->private_key, params.key_size) < 0) {
> + memzero_explicit(ctx->private_key, params.key_size);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> return 0;
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists