linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] ibmvfc: relax locking around ibmvfc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:19:34 -0800
From:   Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com
Cc:     martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        brking@...ux.ibm.com, Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5 v2] ibmvfc: relax locking around ibmvfc_queuecommand

On 1/4/21 2:17 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> The drivers queuecommand routine is still wrapped to hold the host lock
> for the duration of the call. This will become problematic when moving
> to multiple queues due to the lock contention preventing asynchronous
> submissions to mulitple queues. There is no real legatimate reason to
> hold the host lock, and previous patches have insured proper protection
> of moving ibmvfc_event objects between free and sent lists.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---

Ignore. This is the wrong updated patch.

-Tyrel