[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/OUt7+wGGEPkWh8@sol.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:20:39 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add KDF implementations to crypto API
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 10:45:57PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> The HKDF addition is used to replace the implementation in the filesystem
> crypto extension. This code was tested by using an EXT4 encrypted file
> system that was created and contains files written to by the current
> implementation. Using the new implementation a successful read of the
> existing files was possible and new files / directories were created
> and read successfully. These newly added file system objects could be
> successfully read using the current code. Yet if there is a test suite
> to validate whether the invokcation of the HKDF calculates the same
> result as the existing implementation, I would be happy to validate
> the implementation accordingly.
See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/fscrypt.html#tests
for how to run the fscrypt tests. 'kvm-xfstests -c ext4 generic/582' should be
enough for this, though you could run all the tests if you want.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists