linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] regulator: fix pm8009 bindings on sm8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:26:21 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] regulator: fix pm8009 bindings on sm8250

On 31-12-20, 15:23, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> 
> PM8009 has special revision (P=1), which is to be used for sm8250
> platform. The major difference is the S2 regulator which supplies 0.95 V
> instead of 2.848V. Declare regulators data to be used for this chip
> revision. The datasheet calls the chip just pm8009-1, so use the same
> name.

Thanks, this looks sane to me:

Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>

-- 
~Vinod