[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtVU5WfEWbin5hxAkkWLVJw15n2crtPMkmHDRxkBo4_TOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:46:51 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, mhocko@...e.cz,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm: hugetlb: add return -EAGAIN for dissolve_free_huge_page
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:33 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/3/21 10:58 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > When dissolve_free_huge_page() races with __free_huge_page(), we can
> > > do a retry. Because the race window is small.
> >
> > In general, I agree that the race window is small. However, worst case
> > would be if the freeing of the page is put on a work queue. Is it acceptable
> > to keep retrying in that case? In addition, the 'Free some vmemmap' series
> > may slow the free_huge_page path even more.
>
> I also consider the 'Free some vmemmap' series case. In my next
> version series, I will flush the work before dissolve_free_huge_page
> returns when encountering this race. So the retry is acceptable.
> Right?
Hi Mike,
How about flushing the @free_hpage_work when
encountering this race?
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > In these worst case scenarios, I am not sure we want to just spin retrying.
> >
> > --
> > Mike Kravetz
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> > > ---
> > > mm/hugetlb.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > > index 72608008f8b4..db00ae375d2a 100644
> > > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > > @@ -1763,10 +1763,11 @@ static int free_pool_huge_page(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
> > > * nothing for in-use hugepages and non-hugepages.
> > > * This function returns values like below:
> > > *
> > > - * -EBUSY: failed to dissolved free hugepages or the hugepage is in-use
> > > - * (allocated or reserved.)
> > > - * 0: successfully dissolved free hugepages or the page is not a
> > > - * hugepage (considered as already dissolved)
> > > + * -EAGAIN: race with __free_huge_page() and can do a retry
> > > + * -EBUSY: failed to dissolved free hugepages or the hugepage is in-use
> > > + * (allocated or reserved.)
> > > + * 0: successfully dissolved free hugepages or the page is not a
> > > + * hugepage (considered as already dissolved)
> > > */
> > > int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
> > > {
> > > @@ -1815,8 +1816,10 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
> > > * We should make sure that the page is already on the free list
> > > * when it is dissolved.
> > > */
> > > - if (unlikely(!PageHugeFreed(head)))
> > > + if (unlikely(!PageHugeFreed(head))) {
> > > + rc = -EAGAIN;
> > > goto out;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Move PageHWPoison flag from head page to the raw error page,
> > > @@ -1857,7 +1860,10 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> > >
> > > for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += 1 << minimum_order) {
> > > page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> > > +retry:
> > > rc = dissolve_free_huge_page(page);
> > > + if (rc == -EAGAIN)
> > > + goto retry;
> > > if (rc)
> > > break;
> > > }
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists