[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210105234137.d412b08f1b0bc07600dac978@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:41:37 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Disable multiple_kprobes test on
powerpc
On Tue, 05 Jan 2021 15:42:44 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 12:27:30 +0530
> > "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Not all symbols are blacklisted on powerpc. Disable multiple_kprobes
> >> test until that is sorted, so that rest of ftrace and kprobe selftests
> >> can be run.
> >
> > This looks good to me, but could you try to find the functions
> > which should be blocked from kprobes?
> > (Usually, the function which are involved in the sw-breakpoint
> > handling, including locks etc.)
>
> Yes, we did add several blacklists some time back, but there has been
> quite a bit of churn in our entry code. I've been meaning to audit it
> for a while now, but this has been blocking tests. It would be nice to
> skip this test for now until I am able to spend some time on this.
OK, But for revisiting this testcase in the future, I think it should
return UNTESTED instead of UNSUPPORTED.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists