linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] media: i2c: Add support for the OV8865 image sensor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:41:50 +0200
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        kevin.lhopital@...mail.com,
        Kévin L'hôpital <kevin.lhopital@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] media: i2c: Add support for the OV8865 image
 sensor

Hi Paul,

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:38:47AM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
> 
> On Mon 04 Jan 21, 14:07, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 03:27:01PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > The OV8865 is a 8 Mpx CMOS image sensor producing 3264x2448 at 30 fps.
> > > Other modes (including some with sub-sampling) are available too.
> > > It outputs 10-bit bayer CFA data through a MIPI CSI-2 interface with
> > > up to 4 lanes supported.
> > 
> > I've added the patches to a pull request to Mauro; there appear to still be
> > some checkpatch.pl issues in both of the drivers.
> > 
> > I don't mind the warnings on the assignment or the mutex though. Could you
> > address these in additional patches, please?
> 
> Sorry about that, I realized that I never run checkpatch with --strict
> so I completely missed those.
> 
> I'll fix the cosmetic issues in a following patch.
> 
> Just to clarify one thing:
> #define OV8865_PAD_PK_DRIVE_STRENGTH_2X		(1 << 5)
> #define OV8865_BLC_CTRL1_COL_SHIFT_128		(1 << 4)
> 
> these are not single-bit fields so even though it looks like they should
> use BIT(), this would be incoherent with other possible values, such as:
> #define OV8865_PAD_PK_DRIVE_STRENGTH_3X		(2 << 5)
> #define OV8865_BLC_CTRL1_COL_SHIFT_64		(2 << 4)

Agreed.

You might not assign the top bit, but if you did, the left operand would
have to be unsigned to guarantee the intended result (otherwise it's
undefined).

-- 
Sakari Ailus