linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] Remove support for TX49xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210107.010314.1817045693815939591.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date:   Thu, 07 Jan 2021 01:03:14 +0900 (JST)
From:   Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To:     geert@...ux-m68k.org
Cc:     tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, mpm@...enic.com,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        vkoul@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, kuba@...nel.org,
        a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Remove support for TX49xx

Hi Geert!

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:37:11 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> CC Nemoto-san (de-facto TX49XX maintainer)
> 
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:03 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer
> <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> wrote:
>> I couldn't find any buyable product other than reference boards using
>> TX49xx CPUs. And since nobody showed interest in keeping support for
>> it, it's time to remove it.
> 
> I have an RBTX4927 development board in my board farm, boot-test every
> bi-weekly renesas-drivers release on it, and fix kernel issues when they
> appear.
> 
> Is that sufficient to keep it?

It have been about 10 years since last time I see any TX49 board :-)

AFAIK Geert is the last user of TX49 SoC.
I'm OK with whole TX49xx (and TX39xx) removal if Geert (or any other
users) agreed.

---
Atsushi Nemoto