[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210106184839.GA7773@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 19:48:39 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Remove support for TX49xx
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:37:11AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> CC Nemoto-san (de-facto TX49XX maintainer)
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:03 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer
> <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> wrote:
> > I couldn't find any buyable product other than reference boards using
> > TX49xx CPUs. And since nobody showed interest in keeping support for
> > it, it's time to remove it.
>
> I have an RBTX4927 development board in my board farm, boot-test every
> bi-weekly renesas-drivers release on it, and fix kernel issues when they
> appear.
>
> Is that sufficient to keep it?
for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then...
I wonder whether you have seen my mail about the removal
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20201207105627.GA15866@alpha.franken.de
and my call for people owning MIPS machines
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20200227144910.GA25011@alpha.franken.de/
Still "unclaimed" machines are
IMG Pistachio SoC based boards (MACH_PISTACHIO(
Toshiba TX39 series based machines (MACH_TX39XX)
NEC VR4100 series based machines (MACH_VR41XX)
Netlogic XLR/XLS based systems (NLM_XLR_BOARD)
Netlogic XLP based systems (NLM_XLP_BOARD)
Sibyte BCM91120C-CRhine (SIBYTE_CRHINE)
Sibyte BCM91120x-Carmel (SIBYTE_CARMEL)
Sibyte BCM91125C-CRhone (SIBYTE_CRHONE)
Sibyte BCM91125E-Rhone (SIBYTE_RHONE)
Sibyte BCM91250C2-LittleSur (SIBYTE_LITTLESUR)
Sibyte BCM91250E-Sentosa (SIBYTE_SENTOSA)
Is there something on this list you also regulary use ?
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists