lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 19:48:39 +0100 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>, ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Remove support for TX49xx On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:37:11AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > CC Nemoto-san (de-facto TX49XX maintainer) > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:03 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer > <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> wrote: > > I couldn't find any buyable product other than reference boards using > > TX49xx CPUs. And since nobody showed interest in keeping support for > > it, it's time to remove it. > > I have an RBTX4927 development board in my board farm, boot-test every > bi-weekly renesas-drivers release on it, and fix kernel issues when they > appear. > > Is that sufficient to keep it? for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then... I wonder whether you have seen my mail about the removal https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20201207105627.GA15866@alpha.franken.de and my call for people owning MIPS machines https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20200227144910.GA25011@alpha.franken.de/ Still "unclaimed" machines are IMG Pistachio SoC based boards (MACH_PISTACHIO( Toshiba TX39 series based machines (MACH_TX39XX) NEC VR4100 series based machines (MACH_VR41XX) Netlogic XLR/XLS based systems (NLM_XLR_BOARD) Netlogic XLP based systems (NLM_XLP_BOARD) Sibyte BCM91120C-CRhine (SIBYTE_CRHINE) Sibyte BCM91120x-Carmel (SIBYTE_CARMEL) Sibyte BCM91125C-CRhone (SIBYTE_CRHONE) Sibyte BCM91125E-Rhone (SIBYTE_RHONE) Sibyte BCM91250C2-LittleSur (SIBYTE_LITTLESUR) Sibyte BCM91250E-Sentosa (SIBYTE_SENTOSA) Is there something on this list you also regulary use ? Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists