lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Jan 2021 19:48:39 +0100
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <>
Cc:     Matt Mackall <>,
        Herbert Xu <>,
        Dan Williams <>,
        Vinod Koul <>,
        "David S. Miller" <>,
        Miquel Raynal <>,
        Richard Weinberger <>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <>,
        Jakub Kicinski <>,
        Alessandro Zummo <>,
        Alexandre Belloni <>,
        Mark Brown <>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <>,
        Guenter Roeck <>,
        Liam Girdwood <>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <>,
        Takashi Iwai <>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <>,
        dmaengine <>,,
        MTD Maling List <>,
        netdev <>,,
        linux-spi <>,
        Linux Watchdog Mailing List <>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <>,
        Atsushi Nemoto <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Remove support for TX49xx

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:37:11AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> CC Nemoto-san (de-facto TX49XX maintainer)
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:03 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer
> <> wrote:
> > I couldn't find any buyable product other than reference boards using
> > TX49xx CPUs. And since nobody showed interest in keeping support for
> > it, it's time to remove it.
> I have an RBTX4927 development board in my board farm, boot-test every
> bi-weekly renesas-drivers release on it, and fix kernel issues when they
> appear.
> Is that sufficient to keep it?

for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then...

I wonder whether you have seen my mail about the removal

and my call for people owning MIPS machines

Still "unclaimed" machines are

IMG Pistachio SoC based boards (MACH_PISTACHIO(
Toshiba TX39 series based machines (MACH_TX39XX)
NEC VR4100 series based machines (MACH_VR41XX)
Netlogic XLR/XLS based systems (NLM_XLR_BOARD)
Netlogic XLP based systems (NLM_XLP_BOARD)
Sibyte BCM91120C-CRhine (SIBYTE_CRHINE)
Sibyte BCM91120x-Carmel (SIBYTE_CARMEL)
Sibyte BCM91125C-CRhone (SIBYTE_CRHONE)
Sibyte BCM91125E-Rhone (SIBYTE_RHONE)
Sibyte BCM91250C2-LittleSur (SIBYTE_LITTLESUR)
Sibyte BCM91250E-Sentosa (SIBYTE_SENTOSA)

Is there something on this list you also regulary use ?


Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists