[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464482ed-bce6-7e55-bd34-b3be736a6e8b@zhaoxin.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:27:00 +0800
From: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<TimGuo-oc@...oxin.com>, <CooperYan@...oxin.com>,
<QiyuanWang@...oxin.com>, <HerryYang@...oxin.com>,
<CobeChen@...oxin.com>, <SilviaZhao@...oxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: x86/crc32c-intel - Don't match some Zhaoxin CPUs
On 03/01/2021 05:12, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:28:11PM +0800, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
>> The driver crc32c-intel match CPUs supporting X86_FEATURE_XMM4_2.
>> On platforms with Zhaoxin CPUs supporting this X86 feature, when
>> crc32c-intel and crc32c-generic are both registered, system will
>> use crc32c-intel because its .cra_priority is greater than
>> crc32c-generic.
>>
>> When doing lmbench3 Create and Delete file test on partitions with
>> ext4 enabling metadata checksum, found using crc32c-generic driver
>> could get about 20% performance gain than using the driver crc32c-intel
>> on some Zhaoxin CPUs.
>>
>> This case expect to use crc32c-generic driver for these Zhaoxin CPUs
>> to get performance gain, so remove these Zhaoxin CPUs support from
>> crc32c-intel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/crypto/crc32c-intel_glue.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> This does not seem to address the latest comment from hpa.
>
Yes, please ignore this patch. Have send new patch set per Hpa's suggestion.
Sincerely
Tonyw
> Thanks,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists