linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] hugetlbfs: support free page reporting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+2MQi9=4p8Xzqa7JAseQW8iFv+hKBNvdsm7c3o4_y5wr4mN-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jan 2021 09:50:35 +0800
From:   Liang Li <liliang324@...il.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Liang Li <liliangleo@...iglobal.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] hugetlbfs: support free page reporting

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 5:41 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 06.01.21 04:46, Liang Li wrote:
> > A typical usage of hugetlbfs it's to reserve amount of memory
> > during the kernel booting stage, and the reserved pages are
> > unlikely to return to the buddy system. When application need
> > hugepages, kernel will allocate them from the reserved pool.
> > when application terminates, huge pages will return to the
> > reserved pool and are kept in the free list for hugetlbfs,
> > these free pages will not return to buddy freelist unless the
> > size of reserved pool is changed.
> > Free page reporting only supports buddy pages, it can't report
> > the free pages reserved for hugetlbfs. On the other hand,
> > hugetlbfs is a good choice for system with a huge amount of RAM,
> > because it can help to reduce the memory management overhead and
> > improve system performance.
> > This patch add the support for reporting hugepages in the free
> > list of hugetlbfs, it can be used by virtio_balloon driver for
> > memory overcommit and pre zero out free pages for speeding up
> > memory population and page fault handling.
>
> You should lay out the use case + measurements. Further you should
> describe what this patch set actually does, how behavior can be tuned,
> pros and cons, etc... And you should most probably keep this RFC.
>
> >
> > Most of the code are 'copied' from free page reporting because
> > they are working in the same way. So the code can be refined to
> > remove duplication. It can be done later.
>
> Nothing speaks about getting it right from the beginning. Otherwise it
> will most likely never happen.
>
> >
> > Since some guys have some concern about side effect of the 'buddy
> > free page pre zero out' feature brings, I remove it from this
> > serier.
>
> You should really point out what changed size the last version. I
> remember Alex and Mike had some pretty solid points of what they don't
> want to see (especially: don't use free page reporting infrastructure
> and don't temporarily allocate huge pages for processing them).
>
> I am not convinced that we want to use the free page reporting
> infrastructure for this (pre-zeroing huge pages). What speaks about a
> thread simply iterating over huge pages one at a time, zeroing them? The
> whole free page reporting infrastructure was invented because we have to
> do expensive coordination (+ locking) when going via the hypervisor. For
> the main use case of zeroing huge pages in the background, I don't see a
> real need for that. If you believe this is the right thing to do, please
> add a discussion regarding this.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
>
I will take all your advice and give more detail in the next revision,
Thanks for your comments!

Liang