[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/cCbByLzLI12xYZ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 13:45:32 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: guoren@...nel.org
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] csky: Cleanup asm/spinlock.h
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 03:39:23PM +0000, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> There are two implementation of spinlock in arch/csky:
> - simple one (NR_CPU = 1,2)
> - tick's one (NR_CPU = 3,4)
> Remove the simple one.
>
> There is already smp_mb in spinlock, so remove the definition of
> smp_mb__after_spinlock.
Where ? Note that with qspinlock the fast path is
atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(), which does not imply anything of the sort.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists