lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:25:42 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc:     Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>, will@...nel.org,
        ardb@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org,
        song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
        xiexiuqi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: mm: fix kdump broken with ZONE_DMA
 reintroduced

On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 11:34:58AM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-12-26 at 11:35 +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
> > If the memory reserved for crash dump kernel falled in ZONE_DMA32,
> > the devices in crash dump kernel need to use ZONE_DMA will alloc fail.
> > 
> > Fix this by reserving low memory in ZONE_DMA if CONFIG_ZONE_DMA is
> > enabled, otherwise, reserving in ZONE_DMA32.
> > 
> > Fixes: bff3b04460a8 ("arm64: mm: reserve CMA and crashkernel in ZONE_DMA32")
> 
> I'm not so sure this counts as a fix, if someone backports it it'll probably
> break things as it depends on the series that dynamically sizes DMA zones.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
> > ---
> 
> Why not doing the same with CMA? You'll probably have to move the
> dma_contiguous_reserve() call into bootmem_init() so as to make sure that
> arm64_dma_phys_limit is populated.

Do we need the arm64_dma32_phys_limit at all? I can see the
(arm64_dma_phys_limit ? : arm64_dma32_phys_limit) pattern in several
places but I think we can just live with the arm64_dma_phys_limit.

Also, I don't think we need any early ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT. It's only
used by memblock_alloc_low() and that's called from swiotlb_init()
after arm64_dma_phys_limit was initialised.

What about something like below (on top of you ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT
fix but I can revert that)? I haven't tested it in all configurations
yet.

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
index 69ad25fbeae4..ca2cd75d3286 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -94,8 +94,7 @@
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_FORCE_52BIT */
 
 extern phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit;
-extern phys_addr_t arm64_dma32_phys_limit;
-#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT	((arm64_dma_phys_limit ? : arm64_dma32_phys_limit) - 1)
+#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT	(arm64_dma_phys_limit - 1)
 
 struct debug_info {
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 7deddf56f7c3..596a94bf5ed6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(memstart_addr);
  * bit addressable memory area.
  */
 phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
-phys_addr_t arm64_dma32_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
 /*
@@ -84,7 +83,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
 
 	if (crash_base == 0) {
 		/* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
-		crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, arm64_dma32_phys_limit,
+		crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, arm64_dma_phys_limit,
 				crash_size, SZ_2M);
 		if (crash_base == 0) {
 			pr_warn("cannot allocate crashkernel (size:0x%llx)\n",
@@ -196,6 +195,7 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 	unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES]  = {0};
 	unsigned int __maybe_unused acpi_zone_dma_bits;
 	unsigned int __maybe_unused dt_zone_dma_bits;
+	phys_addr_t dma32_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(32);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
 	acpi_zone_dma_bits = fls64(acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address());
@@ -205,8 +205,12 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
-	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
+	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = PFN_DOWN(dma32_phys_limit);
+	if (!arm64_dma_phys_limit)
+		arm64_dma_phys_limit = dma32_phys_limit;
 #endif
+	if (!arm64_dma_phys_limit)
+		arm64_dma_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
 	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_NORMAL] = max;
 
 	free_area_init(max_zone_pfns);
@@ -394,16 +398,9 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
 
 	early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32))
-		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(32);
-	else
-		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
-
 	reserve_elfcorehdr();
 
 	high_memory = __va(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
-
-	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
 }
 
 void __init bootmem_init(void)
@@ -438,6 +435,11 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
 	sparse_init();
 	zone_sizes_init(min, max);
 
+	/*
+	 * Reserve the CMA area after arm64_dma_phys_limit was initialised.
+	 */
+	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
+
 	/*
 	 * request_standard_resources() depends on crashkernel's memory being
 	 * reserved, so do it here.
@@ -455,7 +457,7 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
 void __init mem_init(void)
 {
 	if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE ||
-	    max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit ? : arm64_dma32_phys_limit))
+	    max_pfn > PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit))
 		swiotlb_init(1);
 	else
 		swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists